Loss of cohesin subunit Stag1 in zebrafish limits cell cycle progression and is compensated by altered BMP signalling and metabolic pathways
Lynch, D. M.; Labudina, A. A.; Ketharnathan, S.; Coldicott, R.; Goebl, C.; Horsfield, J. A.; Meier, M.
Show abstract
Cohesin is a large multisubunit protein complex that plays essential roles in cell proliferation, genome organisation, and gene regulation in metazoans. Germline mutations in cohesin subunits or regulators cause a group of human developmental disorders collectively known as cohesinopathies. Increasing evidence indicates that individual cohesin subunits can confer distinct molecular functions to the complex; for example, STAG1 and STAG2 have both overlapping and non-overlapping roles in genome organisation. The zebrafish tailbud provides an excellent developmental model for investigating the coordination of cell proliferation and differentiation, processes in which cohesin has crucial functions. We previously demonstrated that loss of Stag2 disrupts Wnt signalling and mesoderm patterning in the zebrafish tailbud. Here, we show that, unlike mammals, zebrafish can tolerate complete loss of Stag1 from embryogenesis through to adulthood. In contrast to Stag2 deficiency, loss of Stag1 impairs cell cycle progression, activates p53 signalling, and induces a metabolic shift towards catabolism. BMP signalling is reduced in Stag1-deficient embryos and is accompanied by expansion of BMP antagonist chordin expression. Stag1 loss also alters chromatin accessibility at the chordin locus and affects accessibility at chromatin domain boundaries. We propose that modulation of growth and signalling pathways compensates for the absence of Stag1, allowing embryonic development to proceed correctly. Together, these findings reveal distinct contributions of Stag1 and Stag2 to cell-cycle regulation, chromatin architecture, and developmental signalling during vertebrate embryogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Sir2-regulated locus control region in the recombination enhancer of Saccharomyces cerevisiae specifies chromosome III structure 94%
- Separate Polycomb Response Elements control chromatin state and activation of the vestigial gene 94%
- Makorin1 controls embryonic patterning by alleviating Bruno-mediated repression of oskar translation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- C. elegans synMuv B proteins regulate spatial and temporal chromatin compaction during development 96%
- A conserved C. elegans zinc finger-homeodomain protein, ZFH-2, continuously required for structural integrity and function of alimentary tract and gonad 94%
- PRDM1 controls the sequential activation of neural, neural crest and sensory progenitor determinants by regulating histone modification 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A hypomorphic mutation in Pold1 disrupts the coordination of embryo size expansion and morphogenesis during gastrulation 92%
- The Drosophila Cortactin Binding Protein 2 homolog, Nausicaa, regulates lamellipodial actin dynamics in a Cortactin-dependent manner. 92%
- Effectors Of The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint But Not The Mitotic Exit Network Are Confined Within The Nucleus Of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Polycomb group protein Ring1 regulates dorsoventral patterning of the mouse telencephalon 95%
- Cornelia-de-Lange syndrome-associated mutations cause a DNA damage signalling and repair defect 94%
- Regardless of the deposition pathway, aminoacid 31 in histone variant H3 is essential at gastrulation in Xenopus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical and functional interaction between SET1/COMPASS complex component CFP-1 and a Sin3 HDAC complex 93%
- Pre-marked chromatin and transcription factor co-binding shape the pioneering activity of Foxa2. 93%
- The role of the nuclear pore complex in the stability of disease-related short tandem DNA repeats 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.