Brain Age Gap and Cognitive Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis
Lea, R.; Lea, S.; Al-Iedani, O.; Ramadan, S.; Maltby, V.; Lechner-Scott, J.
Show abstract
Background and Objectives: Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), but whether brain age gap (BAG) has greater cognitive relevance in MS than in people without brain disease is not known. We tested whether BAG was more strongly associated with cognitive processing speed (CPS) in MS. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of MRI-derived BAG and CPS from a UK Biobank study consisting of 21,117 normative reference subjects with no recorded brain disease and 97 subjects with MS. BAG and CPS were standardized to the normative reference distribution, and an age- and sex-adjusted interaction tested whether the association differed between groups. Separately, a meta-analysis of the relationship of BAG and CPS was performed using published data from five independent MS cohorts (n=1,250 subjects in total). Correlation statistics were pooled to establish the effect size, 95% confidence intervals and p-values. Results: In UK Biobank, there was a moderate negative association between BAG and CPS in MS (r=-0.35, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.17; P<.001), whereas the association in the normative reference group was negligible (r=-0.05, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.04; P<.001). There was a BAG-by-MS interaction indicating an MS-specific correlation (beta =-0.19, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.09; P<.001). Across five independent clinical MS cohorts, the pooled BAG-CPS correlation was r=-0.25 (95% CI -0.33 to -0.18; P<.001). Overall, the magnitude of the association between BAG and CPS was at least five-fold greater in MS than in the normative population. Conclusion: BAG was substantially more strongly associated with CPS in MS than in the normative population. These cross-sectional findings support further evaluation of BAG as an adjunctive MRI marker. Further studies are required to establish mechanism, prognosis, or clinical decision utility.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accelerometry-derived activity fragmentation as a predictor of brain atrophy and disability progression in multiple sclerosis 95%
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study 95%
- Tissue damage detected by quantitative gradient echo MRI correlates with clinical progression in non-relapsing progressive MS 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha-Linolenic Acid Associations with Disability and Brain Volume in Multiple Sclerosis: A Brief Replication Report 96%
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 94%
- The Canadian Collaborative Project on Genetic Susceptibility to Multiple Sclerosis cohort population structure and disease etiology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the Role of Plasma Lipids and Statins Interventions on Multiple Sclerosis Risk and Severity: A Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- Linking cortical lesions to metabolic changes in multiple sclerosis using 7T proton MR spectroscopy 92%
- Boston criteria v2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy without hemorrhage: An MRI-neuropathological validation study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Choroid Plexus Enlargement in Secondary Progressive MS: phenotype comparison 95%
- COVID-19 is associated with multiple sclerosis exacerbations that are prevented by disease modifying therapies 93%
- Neural Correlates of Remotely versus In-person Administered Symbol Digit Modalities Test in Multiple Sclerosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic subtypes predict multiple sclerosis severity and response to treatment 96%
- Diffusivity anisotropy signature of the slowly expanding lesions predicts progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis 94%
- Predicting disability progression and cognitive worsening in multiple sclerosis using grey matter network measures 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.