Testing a Mates Brain: Courtship signals may reveal signaler decision-making capacity

IIt has been suggested that courtship signals reflect a potential mate's learning ability or nervous system competence. However, there is no rigorous theory that explains how features of sexual signals represent a nervous system's "quality". Such a theory may provide a mechanism for mate assessment via sexual signals and offer an explanation for why courtship signals are rhythmic and stereotypic. In our paper, first we use a general model of optimal neural decision-making to show that variance in an organism's solution time for a given fitness problem lowers the fitness gain rate; more specifically, in well-supported "competing accumulator" models of decision making, we show that noise in the slope of spike rate increase in evidence accumulators increases both reaction time and the probability of a sub-optimal decision. In conclusion, higher timing regularity leads to quicker and better decisions. This finding accords with extensive human study data showing that variance in reaction times is negatively associated with various measures of motor and cognitive performance. Thus, selection should favor individuals that require potential mates to advertise courtship signal regularity to indicate their nervous system's general timing consistency (the timing-consistency signaling theory). The focus on signal consistency (rather than on signal duration or power) may account for why courtship signals are typically rhythmic, are often multi-modal, and why rhythmic signals are also employed in territorial contests. One of the model's several predictions is that individuals should favor potential mates with lower noise in courtship signal features such as inter-pulse intervals.