Back

Neural Correlates Of Subjective Food Valuation In The Context Of Bariatric Surgery

Gagnon, P.; Lachance, A.; Pelletier, M.; Legault, M.; Ross, S.-K.; Iceta, S.; Biertho, L.; Julien, F.; Begin, C.; Dagher, A.; Tchernof, A.; Zeighami, Y.; Michaud, A.

2026-08-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.19.745760 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To examine changes in the neural valuation of high- versus low-calorie stimuli following bariatric surgery and determine whether these changes relate to weight loss at 24 months. Methods: Adults undergoing bariatric surgery completed fMRI scans before surgery and at 4, 12 and 24 months post-surgery while performing the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auction task to assess willingness-to-pay (WTP) for food stimuli. Linear mixed-effect models tested longitudinal changes in WTP-related blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) associations and their interactions with total weight loss at 24 months. Results: WTP for high-calorie foods decreased significantly after surgery, whereas valuation of low-calorie foods remained stable. At 4 months, WTP-BOLD associations for high- versus low-calorie stimuli were enhanced within the frontoparietal control network and right lateral orbitofrontal cortex relative to pre-surgery. These early postoperative changes did not correlate with 24-month weight loss. Instead, greater 24-month weight loss correlated with both pre-surgical and long-term changes (24 months versus pre-surgery) in WTP-BOLD associations within the precuneus, inferior parietal cortex and visual cortex. Conclusion: Bariatric surgery induces early reductions in the valuation of high-calorie foods, potentially through enhanced cognitive control and aversive processing. However, long-term weight-loss success appears more strongly related to trait-like neural differences in self-referential and attentional processing.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.