Back

In vitro characterization of the baker's yeast deubiquitinase Ubp3

Bostelmann-Arp, L.; Khosa, S.; Reiners, J.; Mayor Voeltzke, K.; Smits, S. H. J.; Reichert, A. S.; Schmitt, L.

2026-08-20 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.08.19.745719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ubp3 is one of about 20 deubiquitinases (DUBs) in S. cerevisiae. The current view generally assumes that Ubp3 requires its interaction partner Bre5, which is proposed to function as a positive regulator. Accordingly, the Ubp3/Bre5 complex has been implicated in a broad range of cellular processes for example trafficking between ER and Golgi, stress granule formation and selective autophagy. However, the molecular basis of this proposed Bre5-dependent activity remains unclear. To address this at a molecular level, Ubp3, Bre5, and related constructs were heterologously expressed in E. coli, purified to homogeneity, and characterized in vitro. Both proteins contain folded domains as well as extensive intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Despite this structural complexity, the Ubp3/Bre5 complex could be isolated following either co-expression in vivo or after in vitro assembly. Unexpectedly, complex formation with Bre5 was not required for the catalytic activity of full length Ubp3. Furthermore, even the isolated catalytic domain of Ubp3 was fully active against two distinct substrates in the absence of Bre5, demonstrating that its deubiquitinating activity is intrinsically independent of Bre5. These findings indicate that the catalytic domain alone is sufficient for substrate cleavage, whereas the extensive IDRs of Ubp3 and its cofactor Bre5 might contribute to substrate recognition or specificity. Overall, this study challenges the prevailing model of Bre5-dependent activation of Ubp3 and provides new insights into the molecular organization of the Ubp3/Bre5 system. More broadly, it highlights the importance of intrinsically disordered regions in regulating deubiquitinase function and cellular signaling networks.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.