Back

Integrative morphology and phylogenetics of Arcellidae (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida), with redescription of Arcella leidyana and Arcella artocrea and description of Galeripora purdoni sp. nov.

Taylor, B. D. S.; Sousa, A. L.; Jones, R. E.; Seaquist, C.; Siemensma, F. J.; Taylor, E.; Tice, A. K.

2026-08-22 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.08.19.745684 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arcellidae is a family of testate amoebae within Arcellinida (Amoebozoa), comprising three recognized genera: Arcella, Galeripora, and Antarcella. Although species in the family have been studied for nearly two centuries, many historically described taxa and major morphological groups remain unsampled at the molecular level. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of Arcellidae and generate new cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences for arcellid species from Canadian peatlands, focusing on tall-shelled Arcella historically classified in section Altae sensu Deflandre. COI phylogenetic analyses recover a strongly supported monophyletic clade corresponding to North American representatives of Altae, providing the first molecular corroboration of this morphologically defined group. Within this clade, we redescribe Arcella leidyana based on modern material from Eeyou Istchee (Quebec). We further describe Galeripora purdoni sp. nov. from a calcareous fen in eastern Ontario, representing a novel terrestrial lineage within the genus, and redescribe Galeripora artocrea, which we transfer to Arcella based on congruent molecular and morphological evidence. Phylogenomic analyses of Arcellidae isolates from the Protist 10,000 Genomes Project reveal an additional deep lineage basal to Arcella and Galeripora. Together, these results highlight hidden diversity and demonstrate the importance of integrative approaches for resolving arcellid systematics and refining its classification.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.