Within-Subject Optogenetic Model Reveals Spatiotemporal Cortical Reorganization in Artificial Vision
Gao, X.; Ren, W.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, G.; Xu, Y.; Chai, C.; Wang, C.; Zou, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.-H.; Yang, J.; Sawan, M.
Show abstract
Visual prostheses can elicit simple percepts such as letter forms through dynamically patterned stimulation, yet naturalistic dynamic vision remains out of reach despite hardware fully capable of high-resolution temporal control. This persistent gap suggests the bottleneck lies in how artificial input is represented by the cortex itself. A fundamental question remains unresolved: when artificial vision bypasses natural retinal encoding, what is lost in cortical representation? We address this question in this paper using a retinal optogenetic mouse model that isolates the consequence of bypassing retinal encoding while preserving downstream pathways. Using within-subject V1 cortex electrophysiology and CNN-based decoding under identical dynamic stimuli, we reveal dissociable, dimension-specific gaps. Temporally, artificial vision bypassed the frequency-dependent compression imposed by natural vision, extending stimulus-locked entrainment bandwidth. Spatially, direction-selective representations underwent systematic remapping, with disrupted phase organization and reduced encoding regularity. These findings show that bypassing natural retinal encoding reorganizes cortical representation along dissociable spatiotemporal dimensions, establishing a within-subject framework that renders such structural divergences easy to locate and quantifiable.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Active filtering of sequences of neural activity by recurrent circuits of sensory cortex 96%
- Inhibitory and excitatory populations in parietal cortex are equally selective for decision outcome in both novices and experts 96%
- Thalamus drives two complementary input strata of the neocortex in parallel 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.