Back

Investigating a coordinated regional approach to malaria elimination using mathematical modelling

Eelu, H.; Kleinschmidt, I.; Silal, S.

2026-08-21 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.08.19.26360773 medRxiv
Show abstract

The movement of people across country borders has implications for malaria control and elimination. Namibia is a low transmission country in southern Africa that borders two high transmission countries, Angola and Zambia, yet the extent to which cross-border connectivity constrains progress toward elimination remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility of pre-elimination in Namibia, accounting for local transmission dynamics, climatic variability, international connectivity and current intervention coverage levels. A compartmental mathematical metapopulation model of malaria transmission was used to estimate the change in cases relative to the present status quo. Our findings suggest that Namibia could achieve pre-elimination status by 2034 through robust cross-border management targeting 50% of migrants and travelers while simultaneously scaling up the effectiveness of vector control interventions across Angola, Namibia, and Zambia. Within a coordinated multi-country approach, managing cross-border travel without additional interventions reduces Namibias case burden by up to 33% over 10 years. In contrast, isolated national strategies were insufficient to offset importation pressure from neighbouring high-transmission settings. Cross-border management poses challenges but is necessary for elimination in low-transmission settings. Simulated insecticide resistance resulted in marginal increases in incidence rate in Angola and Zambia, indicating possible health system resilience to increasing insecticide resistance. Overall, this study provides a quantitative framework for regional malaria policy, shifting from isolated national efforts to a synchronised, multi-country approach to achieve elimination in low-transmission settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.