Autism Polygenic Score Is Associated With Sex-Dependent Broadening of Brain Network Variability
Bathelt, J.; Mitsea, D.; Geurts, H. M.
Show abstract
Background: Autism polygenic scores (PGS) reliably predict case-control status yet explain little variance in autism-related traits. Landscape accounts of neurodevelopmental diversity propose that genetic liability broadens the range of viable neural configurations rather than shifting brain organisation toward dysfunction. We tested whether autism polygenic load is associated with increased variability in functional network organisation among non-autistic adults. Methods: We analysed resting-state functional connectivity from 910 non-autistic adults (aged 22-35) in the Human Connectome Project. Polygenic scores were derived from the iPSYCH autism GWAS at a pre-specified threshold (p = 0.1). Modularity (segregation) and global efficiency (integration) were computed at a pre-selected parcellation size and density (100-node, 20%), and residualised for age, intracranial volume, and head motion. Variance effects were assessed by variance regression including a PGS-by-sex interaction, decile-stratified dispersion trends, and PGS-balanced bootstrap resampling. Edge-wise analyses used false discovery rate correction. Results: Modularity variability broadened with polygenic load in a sex-dependent manner (sex-by-PGS beta = 1.92e-4, p = 0.031). Decile trends (male minus female difference = 0.82, p = 0.034) and balanced-bootstrap trends (difference = 1.19, p = 0.032) both differed by sex: variance increased across polygenic bins in males (r = 0.57, one-tailed p = 0.021) but not females. No comparable effect emerged for global efficiency (all p >= 0.54). Polygenic scores showed no association with social-cognitive difficulty (beta = 0.11, p = 0.209), mean network organisation, or connectivity after correction. Limitations: All participants were non-autistic adults and the analysis was cross-sectional. The identified effects are small and the sample size not sufficient to resolve very small effects often reported in genetics studies. Characterisation of genetic effects in women may be influenced by biases in the data used to calculate polygenic scores. Conclusions: Autism polygenic load broadened modular network configurations in males without shifting mean organisation or its behavioural correlates, offering partial support for landscape accounts.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectome-wide mega-analysis reveals robust patterns of atypical functional connectivity in autism 95%
- Reconciling Dimensional and Categorical Models of Autism Heterogeneity: a Brain Connectomics & Behavioral Study 92%
- Predicting cognitive and mental health traits and their polygenic architecture using large-scale brain connectomics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of connectome variability in autism across five functional activation tasks. Findings from the LEAP project 94%
- Towards robust and replicable sex differences in the intrinsic brain function of autism 93%
- Reduced inter-subject functional connectivity during movies in autism: Replicability across cross-national fMRI datasets 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional connectivity in the social perception pathway at birth is linked with attention to faces at 4 months 92%
- μ-Opioid Modulation of Sensorimotor Functional Connectivity in Autism: Insights from a Pharmacological Neuroimaging Investigation using Tianeptine 91%
- Autism heterogeneity related to preterm birth: multi-ancestry results from the SPARK sample 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing the sensitivity of diagnosis-derived patterns in functional brain networks to symptom burden in a Norwegian youth sample 92%
- Functional network dynamics in a neurodevelopmental disorder of known genetic origin 91%
- Altered connectome topology in newborns at risk for cognitive developmental delay: a cross-etiologic study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.