Sexual conflict, directional sexual selection and phenotypic plasticity jointly drive the evolution of extreme phenotypic variation
Pruvot, C.; Badiane, A.; Dourlens, I.; Drame, M.; Mendes, J.; Urb, M.; Vedie, R.; Viala, S.; Vieira, C.; Gibert, P.; Khila, A.
Show abstract
How broad phenotypic variation is maintained in natural populations in the face of selection is a central question in evolutionary biology. We address this question in the water strider Microvelia longipes, where males exhibit striking variation in rear leg length used in male-male contests for dominance. Using reaction norm experiments on inbred lines, we demonstrate that phenotypic plasticity contributes to expanding phenotypic variation, but requires high genetic variation to generate the broad range of trait expression observed in natural populations. Experimental evolution favouring trait exaggeration revealed that directional sexual selection not only fails to erode variation of male rear leg length, but rather amplifies it beyond the natural distribution. Additionally, male-limited selection in favour of dominance generated substantial fecundity costs in females, underscoring the role of sexual conflict driven by females in constraining exaggerated secondary sexual traits in males. Our findings show that sexually antagonistic selection and directional sexual selection jointly generate high genetic variation, which phenotypic plasticity inflates into broad phenotypic distribution of male weapon size. This provides an empirical explanation for the high variability of male exaggerated weapons in nature.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of genetic constraints and social environment in explaining female extra-pair mating 95%
- Sexual selection and the evolution of male and female cognition: a test using experimental evolution in seed beetles 94%
- Ancestral and neo-sex chromosomes contribute to population divergence in a dioecious plant 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.