Back

Early warning indicators for heat-induced mortality in temperate tree saplings

Stock, C.; Dumberger, S.; Meischner, M.; Wannenmacher, M.; Kuehnhammer, K.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Haberstroh, S.; Werner, C.

2026-08-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.18.745401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

{middle dot} Globally, forest ecosystems face widespread mortality events. However, the independent impacts of distinct stressors, such as heat stress vs edaphic drought, remain poorly understood and physiological early warning indicators for tree mortality are urgently required. {middle dot} We exposed well-watered saplings of Fagus sylvatica, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Picea abies to summer heat waves and subsequent natural winter-desiccation. Physiological parameters (e.g. gas exchange, water uptake velocity via 2H labelling, and volatile organic compound emissions) were monitored throughout the growing season and survival was assessed regularly until subsequent spring to capture immediate and delayed mortality as a consequence of legacy effects. {middle dot} Heat exposure without soil water deficit, followed by winter desiccation, triggered species-specific mortality rates (51.8% F. sylvatica, 48.2% P. abies, 16.9% P. menziesii), with P. abies exhibiting significantly faster mortality response than the other species. Reduced water uptake, lower stomatal conductance, impaired photosynthetic efficiency, and altered VOC emissions distinguished non-surviving from surviving saplings months before visible damage in all three species. {middle dot} Heat stress drives mortality independent of edaphic drought, with sub-lethal physiological indicators detectable up to 10 months before visual signs. These early warning indicators could enable damage detection before lethal thresholds are crossed, offering new strategies for mitigating climate change-driven forest decline.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.