Back

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oral and Vaporized Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Older Adults

Costa, G. P. A.; Asnes, S.; Meyerovich, J.; Eid, T.; Nadim, H.; Dwy, S.; Gueorguieva, R.; Riggs, M. M.; Sofuoglu, M.; Matthews, S.; Nunes, J. C.; De Aquino, J. P.

2026-08-21 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.08.18.26360706 medRxiv
Show abstract

Adults aged [≥]65 years are increasingly using cannabis products. However, controlled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in this population are sparse, and remain limited to oral/oromucosal formulations. To characterize the acute pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral and vaporized THC in healthy adults aged [≥]65, we conducted a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 20 participants (mean age 70.0, SD: 5.1 years) received oral (placebo, 5 mg, or 10 mg) or vaporized THC (placebo, 2 mg, or 4 mg) across three eight-hour sessions separated by [≥]72 hours. Outcomes included plasma pharmacokinetics, subjective drug effects, reinforcement value, cognitive performance, heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and adverse events (AEs). Oral THC was associated with delayed, lower THC exposure (Tmax 60-90 min; Cmax 2.6-6.2 ng/mL), with 11-OH-THC concentrations approximately matching parent-THC; slow-rising subjective effects; no change in reinforcement value; no significant change in HR or BP; and no AEs. Vaporized THC was associated with rapid, THC-dominant exposure (Tmax 3 min; Cmax 24.6-53.8 ng/mL) and minimal 11-OH-THC concentrations; rapid-onset subjective effects; increased reinforcement value at 4 mg; and significant HR elevation peaking within 5 min, without significant BP change. Cognitive performance did not differ from placebo at any oral or vaporized THC dose. At vaporized THC 4 mg, two participants experienced five AEs. Oral and vaporized THC produce route-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in adults aged [≥]65, including an increase in reinforcement value only after vaporization, and should therefore not be treated as interchangeable in risk assessment for older adults.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.