Optimal LDCT screening for never-smoking Asian women using integrated polygenic and environmental risk: a microsimulation modelling study
Kowada, A.
Show abstract
Objective To identify optimal initiation ages and screening intervals for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening among never-smoking Asian women using an integrated polygenic risk score (PRS)-environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) risk model, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative screening strategies at these optimized ages. Design Integrated PRS-ETS microsimulation modelling. Setting Japan. Participants Never-smoking women stratified into eight risk groups defined by combinations of PRS levels and ETS exposure. Interventions LDCT screening at intervals of 1 to 10 years, annual chest radiography (CXR), or no screening. Main outcome measures Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), net monetary benefits, lung adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality, and optimal LDCT initiation ages. Sensitivity analyses used a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY gained. Results Optimal initiation ages ranged from 40 to 55 years across the eight PRS-ETS risk groups, with higher PRS-ETS risk associated with younger optimal initiation ages. Annual LDCT was the most cost-effective strategy across all PRS-ETS risk strata, yielding an ICER of US$40,471 per QALY in the lowest risk stratum and becoming cost-saving in higher risk strata. Over a lifetime, annual LDCT averted 8,534 lung adenocarcinoma deaths compared with annual CXR and 14,940 deaths compared with no screening. Conclusions Tailoring LDCT initiation age across integrated PRS-ETS risk groups maximizes mortality reduction achievable with cost-effective annual LDCT screening among never-smoking Asian women. These findings highlight an urgent limitation of global lung cancer screening guidelines that rely exclusively on smoking history and provide policy-ready evidence supporting the integration of PRS and ETS into future recommendations for precision LDCT screening for never-smoking populations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction among Asian Women, Results from Asia Breast Cancer Consortium 87%
- Contributions of occupation characteristics and educational attainment to racial/ethnic inequities in COVID-19 mortality 86%
- Re-emergence of respiratory syncytial virus following the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: a modeling study 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers 94%
- Asian Lung Cancer Absolute Risk Models for lung cancer mortality based on China Kadoorie Biobank 92%
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the U.S.: A modeling study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients 89%
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 89%
- Prevalence, Severity and Mortality associated with COPD and Smoking in patients with COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian Learning to Reduce Cardiac Risk for Locally Advanced NSCLC Patients Based on Personalized Radiotherapy Prescription 89%
- Multi-institutional Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) Prediction Model for Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: Results from the PREDMORN Study 88%
- Noninvasive Quantification of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury using a Targeted Molecular Imaging Probe 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early Prediction of Disease Progression in 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Patients Outside Wuhan with CT and Clinical Characteristics 88%
- Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records 87%
- Integration of clinical characteristics, lab tests and a deep learning CT scan analysis to predict severity of hospitalized COVID-19 patients 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.