Tracking Neural, Sensory, and Sensorimotor Adaptation to Progressive Vision Loss in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: A Multimodal Longitudinal Study Protocol
Verroca, A.; Franchin, E.; Mele, S.; Siviero, I.; Busch, I. M.; Benamati, A.; Sanchez-Lopez, J.; Quisisana, C.; Filosa, A.; Marino, V.; Colombo, L.; Cesari, P.; Rimondini, M.; Dell'Orco, D.; Cecchini, M. P.; Mazzi, C.; Savazzi, S.
Show abstract
Individuals with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) undergo a slow, genetically heterogeneous loss of vision, yet how the visual cortex and non-visual sensory, motor, and psychological systems adapt to this deprivation remains poorly characterized. Existing evidence comes mainly from single-modality, cross-sectional studies that rarely account for genetic heterogeneity, making it hard to distinguish adaptive change from a direct, non-retinal mutation effect, since several IRD genes are not retina-specific. To address this gap, we designed an observational, longitudinal, multimodal protocol that combines ophthalmological, genetic, and in silico characterization with electrophysiological (steady-state visual evoked potentials and TMS-EEG), chemosensory, sensorimotor, and psycho-personological assessments. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with rod-cone (retinitis pigmentosa, Usher syndrome) or cone and cone-rod dystrophies will be assessed at baseline (T0) and at an 18-month follow-up (T1); sighted controls, matched for age, sex, and handedness, will complete the same battery once. Importantly, pairing genotypic with phenotypic data allows changes in non-visual domains to be interpreted against, rather than independently of, each patient's molecular background. We expect individuals with IRDs to differ from controls in visual cortical responsiveness and in selected non-visual sensory and sensorimotor measures, with genotype-related differences explored where sample size permits. Given the rarity of IRDs, the design is exploratory and emphasizes effect sizes and individual variability over large-sample inference. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Verona (CARP 08.R1/2024) and follows the Declaration of Helsinki and the GDPR; findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and shared with patients and IRD patient associations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A demonstration of cone function plasticity after gene therapy in achromatopsia 90%
- De novo FZR1 loss-of-function variants cause developmental and epileptic encephalopathies including Myoclonic Atonic Epilepsy 88%
- Heterozygous PRKN mutations are common but do not increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous electroretinogram signals to screen people with early risk factors for diabetic retinopathy 90%
- Association between Cognitive Function and Large Optic Nerve Cupping, Accounting for Cup-Disc-Ratio Genetic Risk Score 88%
- Longitudinal Study on Ocular Manifestations in a Cohort of Patients with Fabry Disease 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene editing preserves visual function in a mouse model of retinal degeneration 92%
- Can ocular dominance plasticity provide a general index to visual plasticity to personalize treatment in amblyopia? 91%
- A comparison of therapies using Eyetronix Flicker Glass and standard adhesive patches in children with anisometropic amblyopia: A randomized controlled trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 92%
- Cerebral Visual Impairment: genetic diagnoses and phenotypic associations 89%
- Disease-specific variant interpretation highlighted the genetic findings in 2325 Japanese patients with retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.