Self-Reported Effects of IncobotulinumtoxinA on Headache with Migraine-like Characteristics in Participants with Traumatic Brain Injury vs. Anomalous Health Incidents Treated at a Single Specialty Center

Objective: To describe the self-reported effects of incobotulinumtoxinA treatments on migraine-like headache in participants who experienced traumatic brain injury versus Anomalous Health Incidents. Background: Persistent headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head has been widely recognized as among the most common sequelae of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. Such persistent headaches often have migraine-like characteristics and are typically treated similarly to idiopathic migraine. Patients who have experienced Anomalous Health Incidents have also commonly reported migraine-like headaches, but to our knowledge, no reports describing treatment for persistent headaches attributed to Anomalous Health Incidents have been published. Methods: We describe the self-reported effects of incobotulinumtoxinA treatments on headache with migraine-like characteristics in 19 participants with traumatic brain injury and 11 who had experienced Anomalous Health Incidents from a single center. Results: Self-reported benefits from incobotulinumtoxinA treatments were generally similar and statistically indistinguishable between groups. The Headache Impact Test-6 score decreased by a mean of 12 points in the traumatic brain injury group and 9.5 points in the Anomalous Health Incidents group from baseline to peak efficacy (p = 0.43), with concomitant reductions in work/school hours lost (62% vs. 50%) and family/leisure hours lost (75% vs. 33%). Furthermore, reductions in headache frequency (67% for the traumatic brain injury group vs. 57% for the Anomalous Health Incidents group), headache severity (36% vs. 23%), headache duration (37% vs. 50%), nausea/vomiting (50% vs. 25%), photophobia (34% vs. 29%), phonophobia (30% vs. 37%), visual aura (50% vs. 29%), vestibular aura (50% vs. 33%), and other aura (21% vs. 25%) from baseline to peak efficacy were similar in both groups. Likewise, time from treatment to response (6.5 vs. 7 days), duration of response (10.2 vs. 9.1 weeks), adverse effects (3/19 for the traumatic brain injury group, 3/11 for the Anomalous Health Incidents group), and improved efficacy of concomitant abortive treatments (30% vs. 50% for pain, 50% vs. 55% for aura) did not differ between groups. Osmophobia and cogniphobia, when present, did not improve on average in either group. Notably, the mean duration of response was less than 12 weeks in both groups, with only 3 participants with traumatic brain injury and 1 participant who had experienced Anomalous Health Incidents reporting benefit beyond the typical 12-week incobotulinumtoxinA treatment interval. Conclusion: Overall, these findings provisionally indicate that at least some patients who have experienced Anomalous Health Incidents may subjectively benefit from incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for persistent migraine-like headaches similarly to patients with traumatic brain injury. Limitations include the open-label, single-center, primarily retrospective design; small sample size; and limited representativeness. Further prospective controlled studies are needed to determine whether these groups truly respond similarly to incobotulinumtoxinA and other standard treatments.