Back

The Yamanashi Multi-omics Cohort (YMoC): study design of a screening-defined longitudinal metabolic-risk cohort with integrated multi-omics and digital phenotyping

Goto, G.; Hanawa, D.; Naito, K.; Wang, Q. S.; Kanai, S.; Awaji, M.; Nishikawa, H.; Yui, H.; Nishitani, S.; Miyake, K.; Ooka, T.

2026-08-21 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.08.18.26360529 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Large-scale biobanks have advanced genomic and epidemiologic research, but many rely on infrequent biological sampling and limited digital phenotyping. The Yamanashi Multi-omics Cohort (YMoC) was established to support longitudinal assessment of molecular, clinical, and behavioural changes in a screening-defined cohort of adults at elevated metabolic risk without diagnosed diabetes. Methods: YMoC is a longitudinal cohort of 215 adults aged 30-70 years in Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan, who met prespecified glycaemic eligibility criteria at health check-up, including fasting plasma glucose 100-125 mg/dL (5.6-6.9 mmol/L) and HbA1c <6.5%. Participants underwent three in-person visits over six months. Measurements include 75-g oral glucose tolerance testing with serial sampling, clinical biochemistry, anthropometry, liver elastography, and collection of blood, urine, stool, and saliva for multi-omics profiling. Between visits, participants wore a Fitbit Inspire 3 and completed daily app-based questionnaires using the Taohealth app. Current molecular data include genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism array genotyping and longitudinal plasma proteomics in a subset. Conclusions: YMoC is designed to evaluate within-person molecular and phenotypic trajectories in a screening-defined metabolic-risk cohort. The cohort provides a dense longitudinal resource linking clinical assessments, biospecimens, omics assays, and digital phenotyping, including analyses of insulin-resistance-related markers such as homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.