Back

Rituximab for autoimmune myasthenic syndromes: a retrospective cohort study in myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

Chamani Cheri, R.; Grittner, U.; Doksani, P.; Dusemund, C.; Gerischer, L.; Herdick, M. L.; Hoffmann, S.; Lehnerer, S.; Stascheit, F.; Stein, M.; Meisel, A.; Mergenthaler, P.

2026-08-21 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.18.26360320 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTION Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) are autoimmune diseases of the neuromuscular junction resulting in fatigable muscle weakness. Rituximab (RTX) is used to treat patients refractory to standard immunosuppression, but evidence for its efficacy remains inconsistent. Here, we analyzed real-world data on the clinical course and side effects of RTX in MG and LEMS patients. METHODS This was a single-center study of all patients diagnosed with MG (n=64) or LEMS (n=5) treated with RTX from 2011 until 2021. Outcomes of RTX treatment were recorded retrospectively with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status (MGFA-PIS), number of rescue therapies, myasthenic crises, and steroid dose at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. RESULTS MGFA-PIS improved at both 1-year (y) and 2-y follow-up compared with baseline. Incidence rates of rescue therapies per 100 person-months (95% CI) decreased from 15.0 (11.8-18.8) at baseline to 7.5 (4.7-12.3) at 1-y and 4.3 (2.5-7.8) at 2y-follow-up. The number of patients without myasthenic crises within one year increased from baseline (49, 86.0%) to 1y-follow-up (55, 96.5%). Median (IQR) daily steroid dose decreased from 10 (5-22.5) mg/d at baseline to 4 (0-10) mg/d at 1y-follow-up, and to 2.5 (0-10) mg/d at 2y-follow-up. CONCLUSION This study indicates that RTX was associated with a stabilized clinical course and decreased steroid use in patients with autoimmune myasthenic syndromes, including those with thymoma-associated MG. Our data suggest that therapeutic benefit is apparent within the first year of treatment and is maintained through two years.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.