Back

Distinct subcellular localizations of DUF1218 proteins in Marchantia polymorpha and Nicotiana benthamiana reveal two different plasmodesmata-targeting mechanisms

Ta Thi Thuy, L.; Shiuan-Jie, T.; Mutte, S. K.; Lee, H.-C.; Hsu, C.-M.; Chang, H.-Y.; Lu, K.-J.

2026-08-21 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.17.745377 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmodesmata are membrane-lined channels connecting plant cells to facilitate intercellular transport of molecules. Although many plasmodesmata-localized proteins have evolved throughout plant evolution, whether they use a conserved targeting system remains unclear. In the bryophyte Marchantia polymorpha, we identified two DUF1218-domain proteins homologous to the Arabidopsis plasmodesmata-localized AtTVA. When ectopically expressed, MpDUF1218-1 localized to plasmodesmata in both Nicotiana benthamiana and M. polymorpha, whereas MpDUF1218-2 formed cytoplasmic puncta in both species. Unexpectedly, AtTVA formed cytoplasmic puncta rather than localizing to plasmodesmata in M. polymorpha. Domain-swap analyses revealed that the first helix of MpDUF1218-1 is crucial for plasmodesmata localization in N. benthamiana, while the first two helices are required in M. polymorpha. In contrast, the second and third helices of AtTVA contribute to its plasmodesmata localization in N. benthamiana. Further domain dissection indicated that other regions of MpDUF1218-1 also contribute to accurate targeting by regulating its distribution among the ER, cytoplasmic puncta, and plasma membrane. Together, our findings suggest that MpDUF1218-1 is targeted by a mechanism shared between the two species, whereas AtTVA relies on a distinct mechanism present in N. benthamiana but absent in M. polymorpha, suggesting the emergence of alternative plasmodesmata-targeting pathways during land plant evolution.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.