Back

Evidence-constrained mechanistic synthesis for drug discovery

Sengupta, D.; Panda, S.

2026-08-21 systems biology
10.64898/2026.08.17.745376 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanistic drug-development programmes often have more biological evidence than they can safely quantify. We developed evidence-constrained mechanistic synthesis (ECMS), a framework that classifies what information each finding contains and converts only that information into restrictions on a family of mechanistic hypotheses. Evidence shifts the frequency of supported events in a reproducible ensemble rather than being converted into unsupported coefficients or probabilities of biological truth. In a chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) implementation, a representative, non-exhaustive corpus of 114 atomic findings from 53 sources and 13 public data resources compiled 18 relation/context constraints and a frozen 4,096-hypothesis ensemble. Regimen evaluation was formulated as continuous multi-node target matching: researchers specify desired changes and importance coefficients for modeled nodes, while package-declared controls vary continuously. A deterministic Sobol-to-block-refinement search, validated on all 4,096 hypotheses, reduced target-matching loss by 27.3% relative to the best of 44 deterministic anchors under a prespecified heuristic demonstration profile; changing the objective profile changed the selected control vector without changing the evidence ensemble. A complementary D-only reference analysis localized decision-relevant uncertainty around the mast-cell-to-disease relation, illustrating that mechanistic prioritization depends on the declared objective. ECMS is intended for the pre-calibration stage of drug development: it makes heterogeneous literature computable while keeping evidence, uncertainty and decision preferences distinct.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.