Resolution-standardized evaluation of ligand atomic coordinates in crystallographic structures using machine learning
Miyaguchi, I.; Hata, H.; Kuribayashi, T.; Takahashi, S.; Kashima, A.; Murasaki, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Terayama, K.; Ohta, M.; Ikeguchi, M.
Show abstract
Accurate assessment of ligand coordinate-density consistency across different resolutions remains challenging in macromolecular crystallography. We introduce the atomic Box Correlation Coefficient (aBCC), an atom-level metric for evaluating the consistency between ligand atomic coordinates and electron density in a resolution-standardized framework. To predict aBCC values from electron-density maps, we developed QAEmap, a machine-learning model based on three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs). The model was trained using Fourier-truncated electron-density maps and corresponding ligand coordinates generated from high-resolution structures in the Protein Data Bank. It was evaluated using both Fourier-truncated electron-density maps and experimentally determined PDB structures. was evaluated using both Fourier-truncated electron-density maps and experimentally determined PDB structures.The prediction accuracy gradually decreased with decreasing resolution, but remained reliable up to [~]3.5 [A]. These results demonstrate that aBCC enables resolution-standardized atom-wise evaluation of coordinate-density consistency across different resolutions and provide a foundation for further development and refinement of machine learning-based coordinate validation. SynopsisWe introduce the atomic box correlation coefficient (aBCC), a machine learning-based metric for the resolution-standardized atom-level evaluation of ligand coordinate-density consistency in crystallographic structures. aBCC provides a common framework for assessing and communicating the local coordinate reliability between structural biologists and researchers in structure-based drug discovery.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A chemical interpretation of protein electron density maps in the worldwide protein data bank 96%
- Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins 95%
- Difference contact maps: from what to why in the analysis of the conformational flexibility of proteins 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.