The Prefrontal Cortex Organizes Visual Evidence by Representational Abstraction
Shen, X.; Miller, J.; Keerativittayayut, R.; Pamarapa, C.; Chunharas, C.; Pappas, I.; Itthipuripat, S.; Ballard, I.
Show abstract
Perceptual decisions often depend on both lower-level visual features and higher-level object representations, yet natural images entangle these levels of abstraction. We used deep neural network features to dissociate lower- and higher-level visual similarity during a naturalistic image-similarity judgment task. Participants relied on both forms of evidence, with greater weighting of higher-level similarity. Across prefrontal cortex, visual evidence was systematically organized by representational level: lower- and higher-level similarity were expressed in distinct prefrontal regions during comparison and remained spatially differentiated as they were transformed into decision signals. This organization was behaviorally relevant, with prefrontal activation predicting which level of evidence guided choice when the two conflicted. Together, these findings identify representational level as an organizing principle of prefrontal cortex during visual decisions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhibitory and excitatory populations in parietal cortex are equally selective for decision outcome in both novices and experts 95%
- When the ventral visual stream is not enough: A deep learning account of medial temporal lobe involvement in perception 94%
- Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatiotemporal representations of contextual associations for real-world objects 96%
- The ventral visual pathway represents animal appearance over animacy, unlike human behavior and deep neural networks 96%
- The relative coding strength of object identity and nonidentity features in human occipito-temporal cortex and convolutional neural networks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.