Back

TGF-β2-induced Snail-mediated EndMT signaling relies on both Smad-dependent and independent pathways

Kalluri, V. S.; Li, B.; Comptdaer, A. M.; Kirtley, M.; Arian, K. A.; Zhou, X.; Kalluri, R.

2026-08-20 cell biology
10.64898/2026.08.17.745236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) has become a central mechanism in developmental biology, fibrosis, vascular disease, and cancer. We previously reported on an integrated signaling model in which TGF-{beta}2 induces EndMT through coordinated activation of Smad-dependent and Smad-independent signaling pathways converging on Snail, while GSK-3{beta} regulates Snail activity. We performed a systematic figure-by-figure reproducibility analysis of the original publication. Independent studies published between 2011 and 2026 were identified and curated according to predefined inclusion criteria. Each original experimental conclusion was evaluated for independent confirmation. In parallel, selected biochemical experiments were independently reproduced using newly acquired reagents and contemporary Western blot methodologies. Independent publications consistently reproduced each major mechanistic conclusion of the original study, including activation of Smad, ERK, PI3K/AKT, and p38 MAPK signaling, regulation of Snail expression, EndMT-associated marker switching, and GSK-3{beta}-dependent control of Snail activity. Independent laboratory experiments reproduced the principal biochemical findings using contemporary reagents and experimental workflows. The combined literature analysis and independent laboratory replication demonstrate that the mechanistic framework in our previous study has remained reproducible across multiple laboratories, endothelial cell types, disease models, and fifteen years of investigation. This work illustrates a complementary framework for assessing reproducibility that integrates direct experimental replication with cumulative independent validation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.