Back

Sustained attention under load: Neurophysiological mechanisms and behavioural consequences

Barne, L. C.; Lavie, N.

2026-08-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.17.745232 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the importance of sustaining attention focus throughout a task, sustained attention research demonstrates a rapid decline of task-focus with time-on-task. Separate research body highlights perceptual load as critical determinant of focused attention, showing that increased perceptual load draws more neural energy into task-relevant processing (Bruckmaier et al., 2020) and improves attention focus (Lavie, 2005). However, the effect of perceptual load on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying time-on-task impact on sustained attention remains unknown. This was the aim of the present study. Participants performed a gradual continuous-performance task, detecting infrequent mountain scenes, among streams of city scenes, under either high or low perceptual load (with or without overlaid salt-and-pepper noise, respectively). EEG was recorded and parameterised into periodic and aperiodic components; the aperiodic 1/f slope linked with excitation-inhibition (E/I) balance: steeper slopes reflecting reduced E/I ratio (Gao et al., 2017). Time-on-task resulted in a wide-spread increase in alpha power, and a steeper 1/f slope in a left temporal-parietal cluster, accompanied by reduced detection sensitivity and increased response variability, as well as increased mind wandering, with reduced thoughts detail. Perceptual load improved task focus, as indexed by reduced mind wandering, but exacerbated the effect of time-on-task on detection sensitivity, and the 1/f slope, which was steeper with time-on-task in a right parieto-occipital cluster with increased load. Overall, the findings suggest that sustained attention decline with time-on-task can be attributed to depletion of neural energy needed for excitatory signalling, which is further drained with increased processing demands in tasks of high perceptual load.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.