Back

Identification of RNA Targets of Classical and Non-Canonical RNA-binding Proteins by soniCLIP

Sommerkamp, P.; Sahadevan, S.; Sekaran, T.; Colucci, S.; Ferring-Appel, D.; Hentze, M. W.

2026-08-19 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.08.17.745202 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/745202v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@52e3edorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f21637org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@909ee8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b0c907_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGRAPHICAL ABSTRACTC_FLOATNO C_FIG Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (CLIP-seq) is widely used to identify the RNA targets of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). However, its application to non-canonical RBPs lacking canonical RNA-binding domains and frequently displaying low or transient RNA occupancy, is limited by low signal-to-noise ratios, high input requirements and error-prone ligation steps during library preparation. To overcome these limitations, we developed soniCLIP, a streamlined CLIP-seq workflow that replaces RNase-mediated RNA fragmentation with sonication and uses a ligation-free strategy for library construction. soniCLIP is optimized for reproducible identification of enriched RBP-associated RNA regions from limited starting material. We benchmarked soniCLIP against the widespread eCLIP approach and observed reproducible recovery of known RBP-associated regions and target recovery comparable to ENCODE eCLIP, while requiring only 10% (500 {micro}g) of protein input. We further applied soniCLIP to the glycolytic enzyme and non-canonical RBP pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2). We identified 197 significantly enriched RNA regions and validated selected targets by RIP-qRT-PCR and in vitro binding assays. By combining reduced input requirements, high reproducibility, a shortened 3.5-day workflow and the elimination of gel-based purification, soniCLIP provides an efficient and robust approach for the identification of RNA targets of canonical and non-canonical RBPs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.