Reward evokes value-independent arousal and value-dependent reinforcement processing as dissociable physiological consequences
Nakashima, Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Watanabe, T.
Show abstract
Reward is traditionally thought to drive value-dependent reinforcement processing, whereas recent work suggests reward may instead raise arousal that mimics reinforcement. Because reinforcement and arousal depend on partly distinct neuromodulatory systems yet are co-triggered by reward, they have been widely treated as closely linked, though rarely tested directly, leaving reward's physiological consequences difficult to interpret. We manipulated the value of a primary reward by varying thirst while independently inducing arousal with sound, and measured pupil diameter and electroencephalographic activity. High- and low-value rewards produced comparable pupil dilation, indicating value-independent arousal. In contrast, only high-value reward increased alpha-band power, progressing from anterior to posterior regions, whereas low-value reward and sound produced similar alpha suppression without regional progression. Thus, reward evokes two dissociable consequences: value-independent arousal and value-dependent reinforcement. Rather than a single coupled process, these arise through separable mechanisms, providing a physiological framework for distinguishing each mechanism's contribution to reward processing.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optogenetic hedonic hotspots in orbitofrontal cortex and insula: causing enhancement of sweetness liking 94%
- Cardiac-sympathetic contractility and neural alpha-band power: cross-modal collaboration during approach-avoidance conflict 94%
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared neural underpinnings of multisensory integration and trial-by-trial perceptual recalibration 93%
- Evidence accumulation, not "self-control," explains dorsolateral prefrontal activationduring normative choice 93%
- Omissions of Threat Trigger Subjective Relief and Prediction Error-Like Signaling in the Human Reward and Salience Systems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as a temporal difference prediction error 93%
- Dynamical management of potential threats regulated by dopamine and direct- and indirect-pathway neurons in the tail of the striatum 93%
- Disinhibition of the orbitofrontal cortex biases decision making in obesity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.