Back

Proteomic biomarker candidates inversely associated with menopausal symptoms in midlife women

Sasanuma, M.; Kuroki, M.; Tabata, H.; Kajiwara, A.; Shiraki, A.; Abdelhamid, R. F.; Nakazaki, Y.; Takao, M.

2026-08-19 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.08.17.26360645 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Menopausal symptoms are heterogeneous and commonly assessed by questionnaires. We explored serum two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein spots associated with menopausal symptom burden. Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional study included 27 women aged 45-55 years. A total of 550 matched serum 2-DE spots were quantified. A frequency-adjusted symptom burden score was calculated as the sum of severity x frequency products across 10 symptoms. Spots were screened using Spearman rank correlation with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment, followed by qualitative image review. Spots #285 and #636 were prioritized for vasomotor and psychological domain analyses. Results: The median age was 51.0 years; 13 participants were menstruating and 14 were amenorrheic. The median overall symptom burden score was 45.0 (interquartile range, 6.5-58.5) and was inversely correlated with spots #285 and #636. Spot #285 was inversely correlated with vasomotor symptom score, including inverse correlations in both menstrual-status groups. Spot #636 was inversely correlated with psychological symptom score overall, with a stronger descriptive correlation among menstruating participants. Neither candidate remained significant after FDR adjustment. Conclusions: Spots #285 and #636 are hypothesis-generating candidates requiring molecular identification, analytical validation, multiplicity-aware confirmation, and independent replication.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.