Defining Core Competencies and Training Priorities for Infectious Disease Dynamics as a Discipline
Keegan, L.; Shoaf, K.
Show abstract
Infectious disease dynamics is a growing, interdisciplinary field that aims to advance the understanding of how infectious diseases spread and how to control them. Most trainees enter the field through established disciplines and assemble ad hoc training and experience in infectious disease dynamics. As such, expectations for doctoral training remain largely implicit and highly variable across institutions. Other fields have formalized training expectations though defined training competencies, which promote transparency and alignment across institutions without prescribing specific approaches to training or research. In this paper, we set out to define the core competencies that characterize doctoral-level expertise in infectious disease dynamics. We assembled a team of seven people at the University of Utah and drafted a competency set. We then validated the competency set with experts in the field using an e-Delphi process. We did not restrict participation by location, job title, or sector. We set an a priori threshold for consensus to 70% and sent out two rounds of surveys to experts, asking them to rank the competencies by order of importance. Our team initially generated a list of 13 proposed Cross-cutting, 24 Applied Modeling, 17 Data Science, and 16 Theory competencies. After completing two rounds of validation, we validated two tracks comprised of 7 Cross-cutting, 10 Applied Modeling, and 12 Theory competencies. This study represents the first structured effort to define doctoral-level competencies in infectious disease that can help guide curriculum development, comprehensive exam preparation, and trainee evaluation, while also supporting alignment between academic training and workforce needs.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 92%
- The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: supporting design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training 92%
- "When I talk about it, my eyes light up!" Impacts of a national laboratory internship on community college student success 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducibility of COVID-era infectious disease models 90%
- Using an Agent-Based Model to Assess K-12 School Reopenings Under Different COVID-19 Spread Scenarios – United States, School Year 2020/21 89%
- Scenario Design for Infectious Disease Projections: Integrating Concepts from Decision Analysis and Experimental Design 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 89%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 89%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 89%
- Application and Evaluation of Flipped Teaching Based on Video Conference in Standardized Training for Internal Medicine Residents 89%
- Measuring the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a city level: An agent-based computational modeling study of the City of Natal 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.