Levodopa Administration Timing During Hospitalization: Associations With Intensive Care Unit Exposure and Documented Access Type

Background: Levodopa is time-critical in hospitalized Parkinson disease. Whether dosing fidelity depends on care setting or documented access status is unclear. Objectives: To quantify levodopa dosing fidelity, test ICU exposure with clustering-aware methods, and test whether documented access type is associated with delayed or omitted dosing. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV (2011-2022). Adults with Parkinson disease and [&ge;]1 scheduled levodopa dose contributed 1,665 admissions and 39,322 doses. ICU exposure was tested with a patient-clustered GEE model. Among ICU-exposed doses, access type (normal, tube feeding, parenteral nutrition, NPO) was modeled in one fully adjusted model and tested for specificity, restricted to the ICU, against an active-comparator medication (statins). Results: Of 39,322 doses, 79.8% were on time by the primary 60-minute definition; a symmetric {+/-}15-minute definition classified 68.8% as mistimed. ICU exposure was not associated with delayed or omitted dosing after clustering (patient-clustered OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01). Among ICU-exposed doses, NPO was associated with delayed or omitted dosing (adjusted OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.36-2.62) and tube feeding with lower odds (adjusted OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92; P < .001). The comparator medication showed a directionally consistent but inconclusive interaction (OR, 1.27-1.28; 92 patients). A route-order association was not observed among immediate-release formulations (OR, 0.72; 4 patients). Conclusions: ICU admission alone was not associated with dosing unreliability after clustering. Among ICU-exposed doses, access type, not a single pooled category, was associated with dosing reliability; a comparator-medication check, valid only in the ICU, was directionally consistent but inconclusive.