Site-Specific Cancer Incidence among Clinical Subtypes of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in the United States
Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Weber, M. B.; Ali, M. K.; Hofmeister, C. C.; Varghese, J. S.
Show abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with elevated rates of several cancers and is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease, but whether its clinically distinct subtypes carry different cancer risks is unknown. Methods: In this matched retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the Epic Cosmos Research Platform (2012-2025), adults with newly diagnosed T2D were classified into severe insulin-deficient (SIDD, 21.6%), mild obesity-related (MOD, 23.5%), mild age-related (MARD, 40.7%), or mixed (14.1%) subtypes using validated algorithms and matched to adults without diabetes on age, sex, and body mass index. Cause-specific Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for seven site-specific cancers, accounting for competing risks. Cancer screening uptake was assessed as a secondary outcome. Results: Among 575,139 adults with T2D and 689,719 without diabetes (median follow-up, 3.8 years), MARD had the highest cancer incidence (17.3 per 1,000 person-years). Relative to adults without diabetes, rates of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, endometrial, and ovarian cancer were elevated across subtypes, with the highest hazards in SIDD (HR=3.87, 95% CI=3.51 to 4.27) and mixed phenotypes. Prostate cancer rates were lower in all subtypes, most markedly in MOD (HR=0.60, 95% CI=0.55 to 0.64). Rates of breast cancer were higher among mixed (HR=1.12, 95% CI=1.05 to 1.19) and lower among MOD (HR=0.85, 95% CI=0.80 to 0.90). Mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening were lower across subtypes. Conclusions: Site-specific cancer incidence and screening uptake differed across clinically defined subtypes of T2D. Subtype classification from routine clinical data may inform targeted cancer surveillance, though further study is needed before clinical use.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): A population-based cohort study 93%
- Hepatic and abdominal adiposity in type 2 diabetes as assessed with machine learning on CT scans 92%
- Subgroups of adult-onset diabetes: a prospective follow-up study of progression of insulin resistance and deficiency and association with liver steatosis and fibrosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a Trans-Ancestry polygenic risk score for Type 1 Diabetes 92%
- Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium 91%
- Role of Weight Loss Induced Prediabetes Remission in the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes – Time to Improve Diabetes Prevention 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing the power of polygenic risk scores to predict type 2 diabetes and its subtypes in a high-risk population of British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in a routine healthcare setting 91%
- Maternal and child gluten intake and risk of type 1 diabetes: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study 91%
- Trends in weight gain recorded in English primary care before and during the Coronavirus-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for age-related increases in HbA1c more accurately quantifies risk of Type 1 Diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive adults 91%
- The impact of ancestry on performance of type 1 diabetes genetic risk scores: high discrimination performance is maintained in African ancestry populations, but population specific thresholds may improve risk prediction 91%
- Relation of incident Type 1 diabetes to recent COVID-19 infection: cohort study using e-health record linkage in Scotland 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.