The KRAS G12C Inhibitor Divarasib Stabilizes RBM39 and Antagonizes Aryl-Sulfonamide Degraders
Chen, S.-Y.; Zou, Y.; Wu, J.; Nam, G.; Lee, H.; Chen, Y.; Federico, C.; Setayeshpour, Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Wu, S.-C.; Strickler, J. H.; Hong, J.; Fitzgerald, M. C.; Chi, J.-T. A.
Show abstract
KRAS G12C inhibitors have demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit in KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet responses remain heterogeneous and treatment-associated toxicities persist for reasons that are incompletely understood. Cysteine profiling indicates that these covalent inhibitors are highly selective for mutant KRAS; however, such approaches cannot detect noncovalent engagement of additional non-RAS proteins. Here, we used a protein-folding stability profiling technique, stability of proteins from rates of oxidation (SPROX), to identify protein targets of the clinical KRAS G12C inhibitor, divarasib (GDC-6036), in KRAS-mutant NSCLC lysates. SPROX revealed a focused set of candidate interactors, including the essential splicing factor RBM39, which was reproducibly stabilized at both divarasib concentrations tested. We subsequently confirmed that divarasib directly and noncovalently binds to RBM39 protein. In NSCLC cells, divarasib increased RBM39 protein abundance and antagonized RBM39 degradation induced by the aryl-sulfonamide molecular glue indisulam through a post-transcriptional mechanism. Divarasib and RBM39 degraders reciprocally antagonized each other's cytotoxicity, and RBM39 knockdown modestly reduced divarasib-induced cell death. Mechanistically, divarasib-mediated RBM39 stabilization regulated both INSR expression and alternative splicing, altered downstream insulin receptor signaling, and contributed to divarasib-associated cytotoxicity. Consistent with these findings, RBM39 and INSR expression were positively correlated across multiple human cancer types. Collectively, these findings identify RBM39 as a previously unrecognized noncovalent target of divarasib and uncover an RBM39-INSR signaling axis that modulates cellular responses to both divarasib and RBM39 degraders.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chemoproteomics-Enabled Discovery of a Covalent Molecular Glue Degrader Targeting NF-κB 94%
- Engineering ERα degraders with pleiotropic ubiquitin ligase ligands maximizes therapeutic efficacy by co-opting distinct effector ligases 93%
- Targeting the PI5P4K lipid kinase family in cancer using novel covalent inhibitors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteomic discovery of chemical probes that perturb protein complexes in human cells 92%
- Succinate dehydrogenase activity supports de novo purine synthesis 91%
- RASopathy Mutations Provide Functional Insight into the BRAF Cysteine-rich Domain and Demonstrate the Importance of Autoinhibition in BRAF Regulation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- ABHD17 enzymes regulate dynamic plasma membrane palmitoylation and N-Ras-dependent cancer growth 92%
- Single-cell signaling analysis reveals that Major Vault Protein facilitates RasG12C inhibitor resistance 92%
- Engineered High-Affinity ACE2 Peptide Mitigates ARDS and Death Induced by Multiple SARS-CoV-2 Variants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A focal adhesion kinase-YAP signaling axis drives drug tolerant persister cells and residual disease in lung cancer 93%
- Prolonging lung cancer response to EGFR inhibition by targeting the selective advantage of resistant cells 93%
- RAF inhibitors activate the integrated stress response by direct activation of GCN2 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ribosome Quality Control Mechanism Mitigates the Cytotoxic Impacts of Ribosome Collisions Induced by 5-Fluorouracil 92%
- Inhibition of CDK12 elevates cancer cell dependence on P-TEFb by stimulation of RNA polymerase II pause release 91%
- Dihydropyrimidinase protects from DNA replication stress caused by cytotoxic metabolites. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.