From Scalp to Source: Precise Phase Retrieval of Intracerebral Epileptic Sources Based on Surface EEG
Furuglyas, K.; Huszar-Kis, M.; Horvath, B.; Pejin, A.; Forgo, N.; Lango, I.; Singla, S.; Gorog, M.; Vass, P.; Chadaide, Z.; Laszlovszky, T.; Devinsky, O.; Bagic, A. I.; Somogyvari, Z.; Berenyi, A.
Show abstract
Accurate phase tracking of deep-brain activity is critical for effective closed-loop and phase-locked neuromodulation therapies. However, direct access to deep neural phase through intracranial recordings remains clinically restrictive due to the invasiveness. Here we validate and clinically benchmark the Gabor-Nelson (GN) dipole estimation method for reconstructing deep-brain oscillatory phase from non-invasive scalp EEG. GN is a geometry-based, imaging-independent approach that offers computationally efficient dipole reconstruction and has rarely been applied to source-level phase estimation in human neuroscience. We compared GN with an established MRI-informed Inverse Solution (IS) method using a three-stage reconstruction pipeline consisting of dipole modeling, dimensionality reduction, and frequency-dependent phase-delay correction. Validation is performed using (i) cadaveric recordings, where known ground-truth seizure waveforms were replayed through implanted deep electrodes, and (ii) simultaneous scalp EEG and SEEG recordings in human patients, where pseudo-ground truth was approximated via the intracranial contacts. GN achieved phase accuracy and signal fidelity comparable to IS across both datasets despite requiring no anatomical imaging. In cadaver recordings, phase-corrected reconstruction correlations exceeded r > 0.91 and {Delta}{Phi} < 9{degrees} in mean phase error. In patient SEEG data, GN reached up to r {approx} 0.80 with phase offsets suitable for neuromodulatory timing. GN offers a viable, low-barrier, imaging-independent alternative to traditional inverse modeling for non-invasive seizure phase tracking. This framework opens pathways for scalable, phase-locked and closed-loop stimulation therapies in epilepsy and potentially other network-based brain disorders.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized whole-brain models of seizure propagation 94%
- Multiscale predictive modeling robustly improves the accuracy of pseudo-prospective seizure forecasting in drug-resistant epilepsy 94%
- Emergence of high-connectivity states before epileptic seizures: Multi-patient validation, physiological correlates, and network modeling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-stimulus Brain States Predict and Control Variability in Stimulation Responses 94%
- Targeted and optimized multi-channel transcranial direct current stimulation for focal epilepsy: An N-of-1 trial 94%
- Approximating Signal Sources in Stereo-EEG Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation using Re-referencing and Spectral Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A biophysically constrained brain connectivity model based on stimulation-evoked potentials. 94%
- Low-Rank Tensor Decomposition for Cross-Bispectral Analysis of EEG Data 94%
- A comparative study between a power and a connectivity sEEG biomarker for seizure-onset zone identification in temporal lobe epilepsy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network-based Near-Scalp Personalized Brain Stimulation Targets 94%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 93%
- A supervised data-driven spatial filter denoising method for speech artifacts in intracranial electrophysiological recordings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Cerebellar Signal Detectability in MEG and EEG in Epilepsy Using Anatomically Informed Source Modeling 95%
- Low entropy map of brain oscillatory activity identifies spatially localized events: a new method for automated epilepsy focus prediction 94%
- A novel approach to localize cortical TMS effects 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.