Back

Precise Functional Localization of the Foveolar Representation in Anesthetized Macaque Visual Cortex

Qian, M.; Chen, M.; Barczak, A.; Zhang, X.; Li, P.; Roe, A. W.

2026-08-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.16.744304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The foveola-the central ~1{degrees} of the visual field-supports the highest-acuity spatial vision, yet localizing its cortical representation in the primate brain is technically demanding, particularly under anesthesia where gaze cannot be behaviorally controlled. Here we describe a hierarchical, meridian-based 7T BOLD fMRI strategy for sub-degree functional localization of the foveolar representation in anesthetized macaques. Using drifting grating bars presented at three successively finer spatial scales (4.5{degrees}, 1.5{degrees}, and 0.5{degrees}), we independently mapped the vertical and horizontal meridian representations in early visual cortex through a coarse-to-fine refinement scheme. The vertical meridian was identified by the progressive transition from unilateral to bilaterally symmetric activation converging at the V1/V2 border, whereas the horizontal meridian was defined by simultaneous activation of dorsal and ventral V2/V3 borders at the fundus of the calcarine sulcus. The functional intersection of the two meridia defined candidate foveolar coordinates, which were then refined using localized 0.2{degrees} spot stimuli. Brain surface-based rendering revealed multiple discrete foveolar loci, one at the lateral end of each of the V1/V2, V2/V3, V3/V4, and V4/TEO borders. These distributed loci define the "foveolar core", a newly discovered visual area with distinct functional properties. This meridian-based hierarchical approach provides a reproducible framework for resolving central visual representations in anesthetized primates, providing a new avenue for studying foveolar cortex and circuitry.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.