FoxTail: An R-Peak-Anchored Event Domain for Visualizing and Quantifying Changes in ECG Dynamics
Garcia, N. M.
Show abstract
Conventional electrocardiography is highly effective for waveform and rhythm diagnosis, but it is less suited to showing how the internal shape of hundreds or thousands of consecutive heartbeats changes over time. We introduce FOXTAIL, a complementary view that represents each cardiac cycle as an ordered sequence of changes in signal direction. Overlaying these sequences in a fixed visual field makes beat-to-beat organization visible and allows the density, size, stability, and scale persistence of those changes to be measured. We evaluated the representation in recordings containing normal sinus rhythm, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, severe heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and controlled electrode-motion noise. Paired recordings showed that FOXTAIL descriptors can reveal within-person state changes that are not conveyed by a single average beat. The noise and pre-fibrillation analyses also showed that a dense event pattern is not automatically equivalent to physiological complexity, measurement artifact, or impending disease. FOXTAIL is therefore not proposed as a replacement for the diagnostic ECG or as a new classifier, but as an observation and measurement domain for asking a more basic question: how is the electrical organization of the heart changing from one beat to the next, and which of those changes persist across scale?
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rett syndrome severity estimation with the BioStamp nPoint using interactions between heart rate variability and body movement 94%
- T vector velocity: A new ECG biomarker for identifying drug effects on cardiac ventricular repolarization 93%
- Identifying locations susceptible to micro-anatomical reentry using a spatial network representation of atrial fibre maps 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.