Learning protein function through autonomous experimental interaction
Brooks, C.; Notin, P.; Romero, P. A.
Show abstract
Biological AI learns primarily from existing observations, but many questions cannot be answered from available data alone. Here we show that AI can instead acquire knowledge by acting directly on biological systems and learning from the consequences. We developed a closed-loop framework in which autonomous agents design protein variants, construct and characterize them in a robotic laboratory, learn from the resulting experimental feedback, and decide what experiments to perform next. We then allowed the system to operate continuously and without human intervention for approximately one month, during which multiple agents independently explored protein sequence space while learning from shared experimental experience. Applied to glycoside hydrolases, the agents discovered enzymes with substantially altered substrate specificity toward non-native sugars and progressively learned the structure of the underlying sequence-function landscape. The resulting experimental experience also revealed determinants of substrate specificity and protein expression that were not specified as learning objectives. These results demonstrate that AI can autonomously interact with biology over extended periods to acquire knowledge through experience, establishing a framework for biological discovery driven by continuous experimental interaction.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Linear reinforcement learning: Flexible reuse of computation in planning, grid fields, and cognitive control 94%
- A distributed and efficient population code of mixed selectivity neurons for flexible navigation decisions 94%
- Latent Representations in Hippocampal Network Model Co-Evolve with Behavioral Exploration of Task Structure 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.