Back

Deep in vivo brain metabolomics maps vulnerability-associated and cocaine-induced neurochemical states

Cain, C. N.; Popov, P.; Oliver, N. M.; Vazquez Lopez, J. C.; Evans, C. R.; Hebda-Bauer, E. K.; Akil, H.; Kennedy, R. T.

2026-08-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.14.744954 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Innate temperament affects vulnerability to substance use disorders (SUDs). Identifying the neurochemistry that differentiates temperaments, alongside the metabolic impact of drugs of abuse, can provide new insights into pathways to SUD and treatments. We show that heritable emotional temperaments associated with SUD vulnerability are encoded by distinct extracellular neurochemical states in the living brain. We apply untargeted metabolomics to microdialysis samples to define the chemical composition of the living brain metabolome with unprecedented depth. Using two phenotypes from a rodent model of diverging temperaments linked to SUDs, dialysate samples were collected before and after acute exposure to cocaine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Metabolomic analysis revealed previously unknown basal differences in stress-response, bioenergetics, and amino acid neurotransmitters and their related pathways between the two phenotypes. Cocaine administration also had a profound impact on the metabolome, altering amino acid, purine, and arachidonic acid pathways along with cognition-related metabolites. Despite these broad metabolomic changes, cocaine administration narrowed several pre-existing differences between phenotypes, highlighting divergent responses across genetic lines. These findings demonstrate that in vivo metabolomics not only offers novel insights into the neurochemistry underlying temperament and drug response but also serves as framework to advance a systems-level understanding of other brain-related disorders.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.