Back

Natural variation in soybean perception of bacterial quorum-sensing signals shapes primed defense

Adss, S.; Elhady, A.; Beerhues, L.; Hahn, V.; Heuer, H.

2026-08-19 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.14.744918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants perceive N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), the quorum-sensing signals of rhizobacteria, and can translate them into a primed state of enhanced inducible immunity. Whether this perception-to-defense translation varies heritably among genotypes is largely unknown. Using soybean (Glycine max) responses to N-3-oxo-tetradecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (oxo-C14-HSL), with root invasion by the nematode Pratylenchus penetrans as a quantitative challenge revealing the primed state, we tested whether AHL-triggered priming is genotype-dependent. Priming with the oxo-C14-HSL-producing rhizobacterium Ensifer meliloti ExpR+ potentiated defense in the responsive cultivar Primus, reducing nematode invasion (P < 0.001), but not in the weakly responsive Sigalia (P = 0.082). The purified molecule reproduced this contrast, localizing the difference to signal transduction within the plant rather than bacterial colonization. Correspondingly, the phytoalexin glyceollin accumulated in a priming- and challenge-dependent manner in Primus but not Sigalia, the formal signature of priming. Across a Sigalia x Primus recombinant inbred line population and an independent diversity panel, responsiveness was heritable, continuously distributed, and transgressive. Two genome-wide association studies and a cross-population meta-analysis converged on a well-calibrated null, indicating a polygenic or strongly environment-dependent architecture rather than a common-variant, large-effect-size model. Translating a bacterial signal into primed defense is thus a quantitatively varying plant trait.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.