Back

Isotype specific loss of HP1α but not of HP1β uncovers genomic regions that behave as HP1α-dependent common fragile sites

Yaacoub, K.; Nguyen, T. N.; Julien, E.; Cammas, F.

2026-08-18 cell biology
10.64898/2026.08.14.744815 bioRxiv
Show abstract

HP1 proteins are highly evolutionarily conserved chromatin-associated factors known to play essential roles in genome stability and nuclear organization. In mammals, three HP1 isoforms, HP1, HP1{beta} and HP1{gamma}, have been described, but their individual functions remain incompletely characterized. Here, we inactivated HP1 or HP1{beta} in different cell lines and quantified chromosomal breaks on metaphase spreads in the presence or absence of aphidicolin-induced replication stress. Loss of HP1, but not of HP1{beta}, led to a significant increase of chromosomal breaks on chromosome arms and within pericentromeric heterochromatin under these conditions. Mechanistically, loss of HP1 was associated with a reduction in replication fork velocity, suggesting that HP1 deficiency induces a replication stress that sensitizes specific genomic loci to replication perturbation. Consistent with this, HP1 loss was associated with a moderate but consistent increase in {gamma}H2AX and 53BP1 foci, an increased occurrence of DNA synthesis during mitosis, and enhanced recruitment of FANCD2, all recognized as hallmarks of common fragile site (CFS) expression. In addition, rescue experiments using a chromodomain mutant HP1 (V22M) unable to bind H3K9me3 indicated that HP1 protective function over these specific foci did not require its interaction with this histone mark. Altogether, these data indicate that, independently of its binding to H3K9me3, HP1 stabilizes specific genomic regions that behave as HP1-dependent fragile sites, at least in part by regulating replication fork progression, limiting mitotic DNA synthesis possibly by competing with FANCD2 for chromatin access at these regions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.