Modelling Metacognition: A Joint Prediction-Confidence Model for Predictive Inference Task Data

Metacognition is the ability to reflect on and evaluate our own cognitive processes. It is often altered in psychopathology. Yet, the computational mechanisms underlying these alterations remain unclear. In this work, we extend Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF) models to jointly fit trial-by-trial predictions and confidence ratings in a predictive inference task, providing an individualised characterisation on metacognitive processing. Applying our cognitive computational model to a large subclinical open dataset (N=430), we are able to achieve, on average, excellent fit of prediction responses [Formula] and a moderate to good fit of confidence ratings [Formula]. Analysis of experimental change-points revealed that our model accurately captures confidence self-reports dynamics around these change-points. Posterior parameter estimates reveal a negative effect of sensory input prediction errors and a positive effect of sensory input prediction precision on confidence ratings, respectively. In addition, we replicate state-of-the-art findings related to compulsivity as measured by a transdiagnostic factor score, such as inflated confidence and a decoupling of action updates (here, prediction errors) and confidence in compulsivity. These results demonstrate the robustness of our methodology and the potential of joint prediction-confidence modelling to uncover latent metacognitive alterations in psychopathology.