Back

Comparative analyses of tailbeat frequency and stride length reveal how regionally endothermic fishes cruise fast

Tokunaga, S.; Payne, N. L.; Kawabe, R.; Nakamura, I.; Furukawa, S.; Chiang, W.-C.; Semmens, J. M.; Meyer, C. G.; Watanabe, Y. Y.

2026-08-19 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.08.14.744074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cruising speed is a key factor affecting prey-search efficiency and migration range in continuously swimming animals. Tunas and lamnid sharks (e.g., white sharks) have convergently evolved traits for high-speed cruising, including the ability to maintain slow-twitch, aerobic red muscle (RM) warmer than ambient water, known as RM endothermy. Despite their well-known high cruising speeds, kinematic features underlying their elevated speeds remain unclear. Swim speed is the product of tailbeat frequency (TBF; Hz) and stride length (SL, the absolute distance traveled per tailbeat; m). RM endothermy is expected to elevate TBF by enhancing muscle contraction performance. Furthermore, within RM-endothermic fishes, tunas and lamnid sharks may exhibit distinct kinematic features because of differences in caudal fin morphology and tailbeat amplitude. Here, we compiled kinematic parameters from 20 fish species, including five RM-endothermic species, measured in the wild using animal-borne sensors. Comparative analyses showed that, for a given body mass and water temperature, RM-endothermic fishes exhibited 1.9 times higher cruising speed and TBF than ectothermic fishes, while SL remained similar. Within RM-endothermic fishes, tunas exhibited 2.3 times higher TBF than similar-sized lamnid sharks, whereas lamnid sharks showed 1.7 times longer SL than similar-sized tunas. These results indicate that RM endothermy is generally associated with higher TBF, while significant kinematic differences remain between tunas and lamnid sharks. This divergence may be partly explained by the greater caudal fin area and tailbeat amplitude in lamnid sharks. It may also reflect contrasting skeletal types of teleosts and elasmobranchs, which potentially influence body stiffness and swimming kinematics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.