Back

Seizure Onset Zone Localization in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Using Self-Supervised Learning on Stereo-EEG

Kumar, H.; Martinez, D.; Seshadri N P, G.; Chisholm, J.; Khoury, J.; Parfyonov, M.; McKee, Z. A.; Banappa, H. S.; Najm, I.; Serletis, D.; Alexopoulos, A. V.; Bulacio, J.; Krishnan, B.

2026-08-17 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.14.26360468 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate localization of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) is a central determinant of surgical outcome in drug-resistant focal epilepsy, yet identifying it from stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) remains a slow, subjective visual task. We developed a self-supervised CNN--Transformer encoder (CSOPE-Net; Contrastive Seizure-Onset Pattern Encoder) that learns contact-level peri-ictal representations from 60-second superlet spectrograms through InfoNCE contrastive pretraining. We evaluated this representation as a framework for SOZ localization, seizure-onset phenotype clustering, and identification of clinically labeled non-SOZ contacts with SOZ-like morphology in poor-outcome patients. Across 149 patients partitioned a priori into a development cohort (n=119) and an independent held-out cohort (n=30; 18 good-outcome subjects for classification validation and 12 poor-outcome subjects for SOZ-proximal replication), the model achieved aggregate ROC-AUC 0.854 under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, 0.935 on held-out good-outcome subjects, and 0.822 on an independent external cohort (HUP iEEG dataset), with consistent performance across patients. The learned representation organized seizure onsets into reproducible phenotype families and, in poor-outcome patients, flagged clinically labeled non-SOZ contacts whose spectrotemporal features resembled those of high-confidence SOZ contacts. This signal reproduced in held-out data, and in a blinded re-review three experts endorsed these contacts as showing ictal-onset morphology at approximately 15-fold higher odds than matched non-SOZ controls. This framework augments expert SEEG review and surfaces candidate contacts for re-review in poor-outcome cases.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.