Analysing dispatch decision making in high-complexity environments: The P.A.T.H.S. framework
Rees, N.; Angouri, J.; Ting, S. S. P.; Booker, M.; Nadeem, L.; Williams, L.; Rawlinson, D.
Show abstract
Background Decision-making in emergency services involving the allocation of scarce resources is a key challenge for large, complex organisations required to prioritise demand against multiple, often competing criteria. Emergency Medical Dispatch is a case in point, where Enhanced and Critical Care Teams (ECCTs) represent a scarce and lifesaving clinical resource. Despite its operational and system-level significance, the allocation of ECCTs remains under-researched. Methods We conducted a methodological development study using the P.A.T.H.S. framework (Participants, Artefacts, Transition Stages, Historicity, Setting). We designed and piloted this in our previous work under the 999 R.E.S.P.O.N.D. project, which examined the decision-making process for ECCT dispatch. We applied P.A.T.H.S. to 17 dispatch cases (comprising 100 decision-making episodes). We analysed five data sources: recordings of emergency calls and internal dispatch-related interactions, sequence-of-events records, policy documents, and ethnographic observations. A four-phase analysis--indexing & data mapping, transcription & coding, charting, and synthesising & outputs--was undertaken taking Interactional Sociolinguistics as the theoretical approach and methodology. Results P.A.T.H.S. enables the mapping of non-linear, multifactorial textual trajectories across human and non-human actors. The case example presented herein illustrates how information on key risk indicators (e.g. mechanism of injury) were often delayed, fragmented, or lost between the caller, call-handler, and written records. P.A.T.H.S. provides a framework and analytical tool capturing the textual trajectory of information flow, and trace how dispatch decision making unfolds. We subsequently developed a template and codebook for other researchers to further study complex decision making in multi-actoral systems using a textual trajectory approach. Conclusion This methodological development work demonstrates the potential of P.A.T.H.S. to capture and clarify complex decision-making processes. P.A.T.H.S. offers a practical and theoretically grounded framework for future research, training, and policy that addresses risk points in communication between oral and written forms among teams of actors, to support optimal deployment of scarce resources.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 92%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 91%
- Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transparent comparisons of Emergency-Department prioritization policies: integrating tail risk, target attainment, and utility analysis 92%
- Measuring the impact of an interdisciplinary learning project on nursing, architecture and landscape design students empathy 92%
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 92%
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 92%
- A System Dynamics Model for Effects of Workplace Violence and Clinician Burnout on Agitation Management in the Emergency Department 91%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 92%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 92%
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.