Back

Replication fork plasticity is a therapeutic vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia

Dördelmann, C.; Fung, T. K.; Gasparetto, T.; Bomfim, L. M.; So, C. W. E.; Lopes, M.

2026-08-18 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.13.744634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Uncontrolled proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is counteracted in most patients by toxic and often ineffective systemic treatments. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) show subtype-restricted activity - potent in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and PML-RAR[a] fusions, limited in KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) disease - but the lack of molecular understanding has hampered their clinical implementation. We combined single-cell and single-molecule assays on DNA replication intermediates and DNA damage signalling with therapy response readouts to investigate the role of fork plasticity factors in response to PARPi and AML standard-of-care (cytarabine, araC). In PARPi-sensitive AML models, PARP inhibition deregulates RECQ1-mediated fork restart, initially triggering fork acceleration and later fork breakage within the same S phase. Conversely, PARPi resistant KMT2A-r AML lines are protected by PrimPol-dependent DNA synthesis and its inactivation promptly induces fork breakage and PARPi sensitivity. Strikingly, PrimPol overexpression in PARPi-sensitive AML models prevents fork collapse and PARPi/araC therapy response, both in vitro and in vivo, identifying PrimPol as novel predictive biomarker and therapeutic target in AML. Our data uncover novel tissue-specific mechanisms of action for PARPi and pinpoint replication fork plasticity as key molecular determinant of AML therapy response. HighlightsO_LIFork plasticity is a key molecular determinant of treatment response in leukemia. C_LIO_LIPARP inhibition triggers fork breakage via deregulated restart of reversed forks. C_LIO_LIBypassing fork reversal, PrimPol limits therapy-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity in AML. C_LIO_LIPrimPol drives resistance to cytarabine and PARP inhibition in vitro and in vivo. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.