Back

Morphodynamic domains enable integration of live morphometrics and spatial transcriptomics

Leroy, A.; van Leen, E.; Balakireva, M.; Alpar, L.; Gartner, F.; Gaugue, I.; Pelletier, S.; Pigache, R.; Ech-Chouini, M.; Delpierre, J.; Rigaud, S.; Bosveld, F.; Noiret, L.; Bellaiche, Y.

2026-08-13 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.08.13.744578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tissue development emerges from the coordinated behaviors of thousands of cells, orchestrated by gene regulatory networks. Recent methodological advances now enable high-resolution live imaging of cell- and tissue-scale dynamics and the construction of spatially resolved gene expression atlases. However, quantitatively linking these modalities remains a central challenge, limiting our ability to understand how gene regulatory networks drive cell- and tissue-scale behaviors. Here, using the Drosophila thorax epithelium as a model system, we introduce an analytical and computational framework based on tissue morphodynamic domains: regions defined by coherent cell and tissue dynamics extracted from live imaging morphometrics. Integrating morphodynamic domains with spatial transcriptomics enables the inference of gene regulatory networks associated with distinct spatial cell- and tissue-level behaviors. Statistical cross-scale analyses further allow the interrogation and validation of gene function, confirming or revealing regulators of specific morphogenetic dynamics. In particular, our framework uncovers a role for the Toll-like receptor Tollo in modulating tissue flow, contraction, and apoptosis. Together, our work establishes a framework that integrates spatial transcriptomics with quantitative, multiscale live morphometrics, providing a generalizable strategy to probe and understand developmental processes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.