Back

Ex vivo activation unmasks a sex-convergent, exhaustion-associated CD8+ T cell expansion in Parkinsons disease

Grandke, F.; Diener, C.; Becher, B.; Becker-Dorison, A.; Ludwig, N.; Walch-Rückheim, B.; Tänzer, T.; Dillmann, K.-U.; Hart, M.; Unger, M.; Fassbender, K.; Meese, E.; Keller, A.

2026-08-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.13.744357 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parkinsons disease (PD) affects an estimated 6.4 million men and 5.3 million women worldwide, and still lacks a validated peripheral biomarker. Brain tissue is inaccessible in living patients, making peripheral blood an attractive alternative, but existing studies have profiled immune cells almost exclusively as static, resting-state snapshots that cannot reveal how those cells function under challenge. A longitudinal design, following patients over time, or applying a controlled stimulus to reveal functional differences invisible at rest, offers a more sensitive window onto disease-associated dysfunction, and sex, despite differential PD incidence and progression, is rarely treated as a primary variable. Here, using ex vivo PMA/ionomycin stimulation as a controlled functional challenge, we profiled 195k PBMCs from 84 samples of 14 PD patients and 14 controls by single-cell RNA sequencing across an activation time course (0h, 2h, 4h), stratified by sex throughout. Sex explained more transcriptional variance than disease status, and male and female PD patients showed largely divergent responses at rest that converged, by peak activation, on a discrete CD8+ effector memory T cell subpopulation (Tem-CD8). This subpopulation showed an exhaustion-consistent programme, coinciding with a failure to resolve AP-1 induction and a reduction in inferred intercellular communication. The PD peripheral immune phenotype is therefore better characterised as a activation-dependent response than a fixed resting-state signature, identifying Tem-CD8 exhaustion as a disease-associated, sex-convergent candidate for further study.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.