Back

Prevalence of Colorectal Cancer Molecular Profiles Is Not Captured by a Single Age Threshold

Bermudez-Guzman, L.; Ramos-Esquivel, A.; Alpizar-Alpizar, W.

2026-08-18 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.13.743895 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early- and average-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) are separated at age 50, but whether this defines a biological threshold remains unclear. To clarify this, we identified molecular profiles in nine harmonised cBioPortal CRC cohorts (4,609 patients) by fitting Bernoulli mixture models to 31 repair-state, genomic-burden and gene-alteration features, excluding age, sex and tumour site, and compared their prevalence using <50/[&ge;]50 and decade-resolved groups. Four profiles captured conventional/CIN-like (P1), intermediate MSS (P2), KRAS/PI3K/APC-rich (P3) and hypermutated/MSI-high (P4) states along a left-to-right gradient. Although molecular identities remained stable, profile prevalence followed non-linear P1/P4 and opposing linear P2/P3 age trajectories. Profile-prevalence patterns did not track chronological proximity: profile composition at 30-39 differed from 50-59 but not clearly from 60-69. The age-50 threshold captured only 17.8% of decade-resolved deviance, whereas the optimal age-70 cut-off retained only 51.3%. Validation in 2,579 non-overlapping MSK-IMPACT patients (2,476 age-evaluable) reproduced molecular-feature patterns (r=0.97-0.98), age trajectories (r=0.92) and limited binary-threshold performance: age 50 and the optimal age-66 cut-off retained 12.7% and 45.1%, respectively. Thus, age reorganizes the prevalence of shared CRC states rather than defining a biological threshold at age 50.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.