Back

Deep Learning-Based Classification of Bone Lesions on CT Scans of Metastatic Spine Disease Patients: A 3D-Convolutional Neural Network Approach

Hong, V.; Bulent, A.; Haouchine, N.; Pieper, S.; Wells, S.; Keko, M.; Kozono, D.; Doyle, P. F.; Balboni, T.; Spektor, A.; Huynh, M. A.; Hackney, D. B.; Alkalay, R. N.

2026-08-17 oncology
10.64898/2026.08.13.26360407 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Clinical assessment of vertebral lesion quality (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed) remains subjective, with limited interobserver reliability. This study evaluated a novel application of 3D convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs) for classifying lesion quality from CT volumes in metastatic cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used CT data from 151 cancer patients planned for radiotherapy for metastatic spine disease (September 2020-July 2024). Leveraging vertebra-level expert annotations, we introduced an unconventional U-Net-based strategy converting coarse voxel-wise predictions into vertebra-level lesion classifications. The final dataset comprised 2,125 vertebrae across four classes (no lesion, osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed), split into a 3-fold cross-validation set and an independent holdout test set. Model performance was benchmarked against a DenseNet121 baseline and a musculoskeletal radiologist, with Cohen's kappa assessing inter-rater agreement. Results: The 3D model achieved an ensemble accuracy of 84.7%, outperforming DenseNet121 (72.1%), with substantial gains in F1 score, precision, and balanced accuracy. It showed high concordance with the radiologist (Cohen's kappa = 0.76) and comparable sensitivity and specificity across all lesion subtypes. We found both models and the radiologist to struggle with osteolytic lesions, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing this class from age-related changes in vertebral bone density and architecture caused by benign bone lesions, age-related systemic skeletal disorders and cancer treatments. Conclusions: 3D-CNNs trained with vertebra-level labels can accurately and reliably classify vertebral metastatic lesion quality from CT scans, offering a scalable path toward automated characterization of metastatic spine disease to support clinical decision-making and large-scale radiomics research.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.