Back

SEEG Contact Detector: A 3D Slicer Extension for Automated Localisation of Intracranial Electrode Contacts

Smid, J.; Jezdik, P.; Kalina, A.; Kudr, M.; Janca, R.

2026-08-17 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.08.13.26360270 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Precise localisation of intracranial electrode contacts is essential for the interpretation of stereoelectroencephalography recordings and planning epilepsy surgery. In current clinical practice, this is typically a manual process, which is time-consuming and prone to variability. Existing automated solutions are often fragmented across multiple tools requiring technical expertise, limiting their adoption in routine clinical workflows. This study presents an open-source extension for 3D Slicer that provides an integrated, user-friendly standalone solution for the direct automatic detection of electrode contacts within a widely used medical imaging platform. Results: The proposed method combines anchor bolt-based initialisation, probabilistic segmentation of electrode structures, and non-linear modelling to precisely track true electrode trajectories. The approach was evaluated on a dataset comprising 78 cases from 73 patients, including 1,078 electrodes with 14,480 contacts. The method achieved high localisation accuracy, with a median (interquartile range) deviation of 0.10 (0.06, 0.15) mm. Only 7/1078 (0.65%) electrodes required manual correction; these specific cases were handled using tools provided within the proposed extension. Conclusions: The presented extension enables fast, accurate, and reproducible electrode contact localisation within a single integrated environment. By combining automation with intuitive user interaction, it significantly reduces processing time while maintaining clinical reliability. The tool's free availability as an extension in 3D Slicer lowers the barrier to adoption and supports the standardisation of workflows across clinical and research centres.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.