Back

Recovery from catatonia follows a hierarchical precision order

Saito, H.; Takizawa, Y.; Tateno, A.; Theorell, J.; Arakawa, R.; Tiger, M.

2026-08-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.08.13.26360194 medRxiv
Show abstract

Catatonia offers no principled basis for sequencing interventions when first-line benzodiazepines fail. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the established next step, but specifies what to escalate to, not what to stabilise first. Here we show that recovery is a constrained progression across five precision domains of hierarchical inference: sensory ({pi}s), policy ({beta}), motivational ({pi}m), and fast and slow volatility precision ({pi}v_fast, {pi}v_slow). In twenty-five consecutive inpatients managed without ECT, an order {pi}s [-&gt;] {beta} [-&gt;] {pi}m [-&gt;] {pi}v_fast [-&gt;] {pi}v_slow) held without inversion in every patient. Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) scores fell from 26.3 {+/-} 5.6 to 2.0 {+/-} 2.4 (p < 0.001), and functional recovery tracked restoration of organized action rather than symptom suppression. The framework predicts, untested in this uniformly remitting cohort, that interventions effective at one stage may destabilise another. Within stated conditions, a single inversion falsifies the ordering.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.