Back

The multifunctional scaffold protein Small ovary couples piRNA-guided transposon recognition to nuclear RNA decay and heterochromatin formation

Jankovics, F.; Foldi, Z.; Bence, M.; Takacs, Z.; Gabor, E.; Pettko-Szandtner, A.; Toth, R.; Poscher, A.; Vedelek, V.; Sinka, R.; Honti, V.; Unk, I.; Czimmerer, Z.; Erdelyi, M.

2026-08-13 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.08.12.744517 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The piRNA pathway maintains genome integrity by silencing transposons cotranscriptionally in the nucleus through recognition of nascent transposon RNAs and recruitment of endogenous transcriptional and chromatin-level repressive mechanisms to transposon loci. However, the molecular link between the SFiNX complex, which recognizes nascent transposon RNA, and downstream effector complexes has remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the Small ovary (Sov) protein mediates this connection. By mapping the functional activities of its structural elements, we reveal that Sov contributes to transposon silencing through two distinct molecular mechanisms. First, Sov specifically directs nascent transposon transcripts toward nuclear RNA exosome-mediated degradation by physically interacting with the RNA decay factor TEsup1. Second, Sov directly binds the heterochromatin protein HP1a via multiple conserved motifs and undergoes phase separation, facilitating heterochromatin formation and genome-wide gene repression. Genetic analyzes of sov mutants reveal that these functions are separable: RNA-mediated transcriptional silencing is essential for piRNA pathway activity, while phase separation-dependent heterochromatin regulation is critical for stable transposon repression. We propose that Sov acts as a molecular scaffold in piRNA-guided transposon silencing, integrating transposon recognition with cotranscriptional RNA decay and chromatin-based regulatory pathways.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.