Back

A generalisable method for the purification and biophysical characterisation of bacterial membrane receptors

Bosetto, F.; Zacharopoulou, M.; Bycroft, M.; Kish, M.; Zinzalla, G.; Rowling, P.; McLaughlin, S. H.; Phillips, J. J.; Itzhaki, L. S.; Mela, I.

2026-08-12 biophysics
10.64898/2026.08.12.744447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Membrane-embedded bacterial receptors are challenging to express and purify in soluble form, yet their isolated domains are essential tools for structural and ligand-discovery studies. Pseudomonas aeruginosa relies on the TonB-dependent heme receptor HasR for iron acquisition, a process central to its pathogenicity. Here, we report a robust strategy for the recombinant expression, purification, and biophysical characterisation of the two soluble HasR domains directly involved in heme uptake: the N-terminal plug and the Secretin/TonB short N-terminal domain. Each domain was expressed individually in E. coli and purified to homogeneity, adopting well-folded conformations as confirmed by circular dichroism, NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. We then engineered a fusion construct containing both domains and systematically evaluated multiple solubilisation tags. A GST-His dual-affinity strategy enabled efficient purification of the construct, whereas His-tag alone resulted in insoluble protein and HLT-tag fusions suffered from non-specific proteolysis. Biophysical analyses revealed that the Secretin/TonB short N-terminal domain remains stably folded within the fusion construct, while the N-terminal plug domain becomes partially disordered, a finding further supported by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Together, these results establish a generalizable workflow for producing soluble receptor domains from membrane proteins and provide validated HasR constructs suitable for downstream ligand-screening applications, including aptamer and nanobody discovery.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.